FACT/FICTION

Maps are a generalization of space. Obviously we can’t include all aspects of what we are trying to depict because the map would become overloaded with information. Maps are a great tool to express and point of view or idea about about a particular issue with scaled down representations to give focus.

This generalization and simplification of the real world is where some contention can arise. Maps can be a great tool to communicate our ideas. However are our ideas always correct or fact? Also perception and human understanding play into how maps are understood. In the early age of discovery many believed the world to be flat. So were the maps created depicting the world to be flat fiction? They were, as far as human understanding for that time period, fact. Hoever this is my opinion and many disagree.

The rise in technology and easy availability of software to create maps has also enhanced our ability to create deceiving maps. Employing such tools as color, hue and pattern for example can greatly change the message of the map. Most assume that the darkest color means the most dense representation such as population density. However there are no laws requiring cartographers to employ such techniques. In my opinion this isn’t fiction it is just deception. Is it good judgment or bad cartographic conduct?
There are many ways to utilize deception and sway public opinion when making maps. Despite this, in my opinion, its not fiction or fabrication it is just a distorted perception of reality. Cartographers still have creditability however with the advancement of technology and animated mapping software the public must become more aware of cartographic practices and how they are applied to sway opinion of the audience